Employment laws, regulations, trends and strategies change and evolve every day. With thoughtful analysis, our blogs get to the heart of the issues that matter most to employers.


Keeping track of all of these changes at the federal, state, and local levels can be an arduous task. To help you stay abreast of the most recent legal updates, we provide you with our regular legislation and case updates and guides.


June 15, 2020

On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court issued a ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County holding that the protections of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act which bars discrimination based on sex extend to claims of gender identity and sexual orientation.  In this case, Gerald B...

May 20, 2020

On May 19, 2020, the EEOC announced that FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. agreed to pay $3.3 million to resolve a disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the EEOC.

The EEOC brought a lawsuit against FedEx on behalf of deaf and hard-of-hearing package handlers claimi...

May 5, 2020

On May 4, 2020, the EEOC released a statement that Wayne Farms agreed to pay $175,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by the EEOC on behalf of a class of disabled workers whose allowable absences were capped.

Specifically, Wayne Farms was charged with violating the rights o...

October 12, 2019

On October 10, 2019, a jury found that Walmart violated the ADA by refusing to provide a reasonable accommodation to a deaf and visually impaired cart pusher and awarded in $5.2 million damages for firing him due to his disability.

A disabled Walmart employee of 16 year...

December 26, 2018

On December 17, 2018, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of a Catholic school and remanded in an employment discrimination action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Biel v. St. James Sch...

October 16, 2018

This month, the Second Circuit vacated a district court order concluding that Time Warner’s Territory Sales Representatives (“TSRs”) who spent the majority of their time at work performing non-exempt work were “outside salesmen” and were therefore exempt from the FLSA...

June 30, 2018

Currently, domestic workers who work within someone’s home are not entitled to minimum wage, mandatory breaks, or overtime pay rates.  Domestic workers are specifically excluded from the protections of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.  However, the City of Seattle...

June 28, 2018

Today, Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, 81, announced his plan to retire effective July 31, 2018. After Kennedy’s retirement, the court will consist of four liberal and four conservative justices.  As a result, Kennedy’s retirement will give President Trump and S...

May 30, 2018

 On May 11, 2018, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that it is an employee’s burden to prove that an ADA accommodation was available.

In Snapp v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co., an employee who suffered from sleep apnea took a long-term disability leave...

April 18, 2018

On April 12, 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued an opinion letter regarding whether a non-exempt employee’s 15-minute FMLA-related rest breaks are compensable.

Under the FLSA, rest breaks up to 20 minutes in length are ordinarily compensable because they pr...

Please reload

Featured Posts


June 15, 2020

Please reload

Recent Posts
Please reload

Please reload

Search By Tags
Please reload

Follow Us
  • Skidmore | Fomina, PLLC
  • Skidmore | Fomina, PLLC
  • Skidmore | Fomina, PLLC

Disclaimer: This blog is made available by Skidmore | Fomina, PLLC (“SFLaw” or “the Firm”) for informational purposes only. It is not meant to convey the Firm’s legal position on behalf of any client, nor is it intended to convey specific legal advice. Any opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of the Firm, its attorneys, or its clients. Accordingly, do not act upon this information without seeking counsel from a licensed attorney. This blog is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Communicating with SFLaw through this website by email, blog post, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter. Therefore, any communication or material you transmit to SFLaw through this blog, whether by email, blog post or any other manner, will not be treated as confidential or proprietary. The information on this blog is published “AS IS” and is not guaranteed to be complete, accurate, and or up-to-date. SFLaw makes no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, as to the operation or content of the site. SFLaw expressly disclaims all other guarantees, warranties, conditions and representations of any kind, either express or implied, whether arising under any statute, law, commercial use or otherwise, including implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall SFLaw or any of its members, officers, employees, agents or affiliates be liable, directly or indirectly, under any theory of law (contract, tort, negligence or otherwise), to you or anyone else, for any claims, losses or damages, direct, indirect special, incidental, punitive or consequential, resulting from or occasioned by the creation, use of or reliance on this site (including information and other content) or any third party websites or the information, resources or material accessed through any such websites. In some jurisdictions, the contents of this blog may be considered Attorney Advertising. If applicable, please note that prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Photographs are for dramatization purposes only and may include models. Likenesses do not necessarily imply current client, partnership or employee status.